banner

Subscribe by email (it's free!)

Your email:



Facebook fan site

RR test

call us 888-123-4567
Loading

Working 5-9

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

How much salary is enough? Apparently, $75,000/year

  
  
  

michael douglas on gordon gekkoWhen I finished my undergrad degree in computer engineering in 1999 I got a job paying $54,000 a year, based in Seattle.  This seemed like way too much money for a new grad and indeed I was able to save 15-20% while living well.  My calculations at the time said if I reach that clichéd milestone of a six-figure salary I'd have more money that I would know what to do.  Well, 12 years later I've surpassed that milestone but financial bliss hasn't transpired; on the contrary I spend less time doing some things I love outside work and more time worrying about saving for the future.  How did my financial finish line move and how much salary do I need to be happy - now and for the future?

I found one answer to the question of how much money do I need to be happy in a fascinating study by a couple of researchers at Princeton.  The found that in the US $75,000/year is about the mark when happiness levels flatten out and more money doesn't correlate with a significant increase in happiness.  (though there is no decrease in happiness as you earn more, just a flattening out of happiness levels).  Sure this number is an average and has to be adjusted for relative cost of living but it's unlikely to move by more than 10-20% anywhere in the US.

Ok, so I passed that mark a while ago... what happened? 

Well, as most adults know, marriage and children (in my case, the prospect of) quickly highlight how inadequate one's salary is.  Suddenly, your $75k/year is piddly as you have to save for children's education, buy a house in a decent neighborhood, save for retirement (with its soaring healthcare cost as we live far longer than prior generations).  Any decent retirement calculator will shock you as you learn that having a million dollars in savings is nowhere near enough. [1] When did a millionaire become a working class stiff?  What's wrong with this world?

No doubt some of the expenses we choose to make these days are debatable.  Nearly all parents desire for their kids to have more than they did - hence while they went to public school, suddenly private school is a must.  While our parents and many adults today paid for their way through college, now a college fund that pays through all of undergrad for children is the expectation.  What's interesting is that while our parents, and actually even my sister and I, grew up in very modest upbringings we never thought we were deprived.  Rather, childhood was simple and generally fun and adolescence was fun, if tough at times.  No complaints.

I'm not nostalgic for an impoverished existence (as Harry Potter author J.K Rowling recently professed "poverty itself is romanticised only by fools.")  But that $75,000/year mark is far from poverty and makes me wonder if we've lost our way in the proverbial rat race.

Capitalism's implicit "Greed is good" mantra seems too simplistic an argument and I think the real answer is more nuanced. [2]  How do you resist promotions and higher pay that are the reward to you doing a good job?  When you reach the $75,000/year mark do you say - "no thanks boss, I'm fine without the raise and happy where I am?"  That's actually not far from what my sister, a woman far more accomplished than me, has done to spend more time with her family - i.e. the thing she loves outside work.   Her decision was tough - not least because she saw so many of her peers getting so much farther ahead - but in the end did she perhaps end up in a better place? [3]

Readers - what do you think?


[1] Warren Buffet recently suggested that he and other super-wealthy should pay far more in taxes.  His suggestions may have some flaws, but it seems as though a $1 billion in savings is probably at least one data point of having enough.  Well, that's a start...

[2] To be clear, I'm a proponent of capitalism and believe that a relatively free-market system which rewards the hardest working & most creative is a system that will encourage the greatest economic progress for the majority of the population.  The difficulty is where individuals gain at the expense of others - be it their team or society at large.  While capitalism is a better system than any other economic setup, unchecked capitalism has its downsides as we've seen in recent years on Wall Street.  (Side-bar but for a thoughtful blog post on CEO compensation reform, check out Harvard professor VG Narayanan's commentary).

[3] For a long time women have faced this decision of career vs. family and hence implicitly trading off salary for time with their children.  Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg gives a great TED talk on how women can approach that decision point.

Epilogue: some new research suggests maybe happiness does increase with more money without a ceiling. http://m.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/01/yes-money-does-buy-happiness-6-lessons-from-the-newest-research-on-income-and-well-being/267016/

Comments

When I used to work for a big defense company, I always wondered what would happen if I told my manager that I'd rather take my 4% (in good years) annual raise and reduce my required hours of work by 4%. I'm guessing that wouldn't fly. Extended out, eventually, I'd be making my then-current salary working for 0 hours. Obviously a company wouldn't go that far, but I wish they'd allow you to do it up to a point.
Posted @ Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:37 AM by Bryan
:) I love the idea Bryan. The thing is I like my job and want to keep working, learning new things etc. but somewhere along the way, the idea of working 40-50 hrs/week and pursuing interests outside of work became incongruous with being the best at work. And being the best is what's needed to retain nearly ANY job now. Hence the dilemma.
Posted @ Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:43 AM by Arjun Moorthy
I think the answer depends on one's personality. I knew someone who told me that you can only be good at one thing and that if he had to choose between career and family, he would sacrifice family. So for such a person, taking a smaller position or pay for a balanced life would not bring happiness. On the other side, one of my good friends from Sloan (and one of the smarter women) decided to give up her career until her two kids were full time in school. And she is happy. So I think money, position and how much of it depends 
on each individual's inner motivations of happiness... 
. And by the way, thanks for the complement dear bro!
Posted @ Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:36 AM by Anita
Good point Ani. Indeed, the discussion of how much money focuses the conversation on what really makes one happy. But it takes a lot of courage to say that what everyone else is chasing and is the established path in life isn't what you feel will make you happy.
Posted @ Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:56 PM by Arjun Moorthy
Hi 
 
 
 
Inward looking, One has to work with an objective of attaining Freedom from Money - this requires significant saving in areas where your money can work smarter and harder. 
 
 
 
As you learn and master this art, driving yourself to chase money to pay your bills will cease leaving more time for the author to follow and pursue his/her passion. 
 
 
 
Besides one should draw a definitive line between work and family and ensure not to muddle up each other in in approriate times of the day. The tip is to switch off family when one is at work and vice verse when at home to draw the curtain down for work when you spend time at home. 
 
 
 
Yet another other tip is to curtail materialistic desires as they keep manufacturing laibilities to add stress to earn more money to pay the bills....
Posted @ Friday, August 19, 2011 1:48 AM by G.Sivakumar
This is something new to our generation since we never saw salaries rising to unheard of levels. Even my colleagues who were chief executives were not getting very high salaries. But now defenitely salaries have risen to unheard of levels and it is not the need for more money which drives you ahead, but the desire to be in the top elite group motivates you to go higher and higher. I do not say that this is right, but to overcome this you need lot more wisdom to be like one who has renounced everything. This is of course difficult for a person with a family, but at least spending time in analyzing such issues is a good beginning.
Posted @ Sunday, August 21, 2011 9:48 AM by Ram
Good point on motivation at top levels not being monetary but rather to be among elite performers. Begs the question then if/when astronomical salaries are required.
Posted @ Sunday, August 21, 2011 1:05 PM by Arjun Moorthy
I see this blog is a year or so old, but the topic is pertinent. I'm 39 years old, single father of two and divorced twice. I am fortunate to have custody of my youngest and get a very modest penance of child support, $250/m whereas I cover medical insurance for both my children and pay $725/m for my oldest. My youngest is in daycare so I have to basically cover all daycare expenses out of my salary. 
I roughly make $75,000/yr in a mid-major city in the Southeast. I own a modest yet comfortable home in a safe neighborhood and pay $1000/m for my 30 year mortgage with insurance and escrow included. My divorces still burden me financially (borrowed money to pay legal fees in my second divorce upwards of $15,000...first ex spouse was a gotta have it now type, and she left me with $20,000 in credit card debt that it took me forever to pay off. My 30s, where did they go? 
My salary sounds great, and I do have a benefits package that adds to the value of my employment. But I felt happier, more carefree, more liberated when I was a childless 25 year old in the military making less than half what I earn today. Even before my second marriage and child, I had (barely) enough extra pocket money to afford some "toys" like a motorcycle and a hobby. I didn't feel guilty going out on a Friday night and having dinner and stopping at a tavern or nightclub to have some drinks. Now, I can't save an extra penny. It will get better when daycare goes away, and in 7 years my oldest will graduate HS. Lights at the end of the tunnel. I do not resent my responsibilities toward my children. I just feel as a man that the burden isn't equally distributed. It's very hard to move on with your life and find happiness as you get one day older each morning. I feel like I'm going to be too old to enjoy it when I do cross that threshold. It really is insane that $75,000/yr is basically nothing today.
Posted @ Tuesday, July 24, 2012 7:30 AM by WHR
Dear WHR - thanks for your very thoughtful comment. Your situation sounds tough and indeed $75k doesn't seem like a lot to cover the expenses you have.  
 
If I may, one observation I have from my very modest childhood was that the best memories were with my family and often involved no money. e.g. a picnic in the park, camping in the backyard, riding very old bicycles in the woods, spraying each other with a garden hose on hot days etc.  
 
I don't know how the above memories would be different had my parents also gone through a divorce so not sure how applicable this is to you. But maybe you're providing a lifetime of wonderful memories for your children by being there for them and perhaps that can be a source of happiness for you. I know it is for me as I eschew the things that made me happy in my 20s (going out to a bar or restaurant) for the simpler things in life with my family and friends.
Posted @ Tuesday, July 24, 2012 8:51 AM by arjun
Oh goodness, I think I left the wrong impression, but thanks for your comment! 
 
Trust me, I'm 39. I really don't go out of my way to "party" anymore...the type of things I did in my 20s. And I do find lots of fun things to do with me kids. 
 
But I do feel that one mistake people make in life is putting their own ambitions, goals, personal desires, so far on the back burner. This is easy to do when you are married and sharing your life with a spouse...but even there and marriage counselor will tell you to make one or two days a month "date night"...hire a babysitter, get dressed up, go out and act like its your first date. Wine, dine, dance...or if that isn't your thing, take a trip to the library or park together. But still, make time for yourselves, and also make time for individual pursuits. 
 
When you are a single parent all of that is out the window if you don't have the extra pocket money to make it happen. I do feel like going on dates now and then. It's hard to date anyone regularly, as a guy, when you are sweating over the dinner tab (though I don't let that visibly bother me, it deters me from dating anyone seriously). Guys do not tend to be as social as women overall, and I have rare opportunities to do "guy things" with guy friends. The exception being during football season. But even then it's hard to justify a babysitter and the guys arent keen about a preschooler at the game party.  
 
But it isn't about my kids. It's about money. That's the point. Not only does a single parent, particularly a father who is somewhat out of his element raising a child on his own, have to almost become a hermit, but it blows my mind how someone with more than modest resources (as I would think my career provides) has a hard time coming up with the pocket money for any extracurricular stuff. I guess I should count my blessings that I have a roof over my head and a job. And I do. But I also can't help compare myself to my friends my age and as a guy, with our natural competitive spirit, it can be quite depressing thinking I'm almost 40 but many 25 year olds have more financial strength with lesser paying jobs. That's it!
Posted @ Tuesday, July 24, 2012 7:40 PM by WHR
A recent study says money can buy happiness and there's no ceiling at $75k. http://m.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/01/yes-money-does-buy-happiness-6-lessons-from-the-newest-research-on-income-and-well-being/267016/ 
 
From personal experiences and reading details like this: http://www.quora.com/What-does-it-feel-like-to-be-financially-rich I disagree and think there is a ceiling but it could be higher than $75k and maybe closer to a savings number, say $1-2M in the US, for a family.
Posted @ Friday, January 18, 2013 3:09 PM by arjun
Please take a look at http://www.mrmoneymustache.com. 
 
I'm interested in your thoughts about it. I for one am sold on his attitude to life and trying to get there.
Posted @ Friday, January 18, 2013 10:19 PM by Nikhil
My brother & I grew in a stereotypical suburban household of the late 70's early 80's both of our parents worked, however, the large majority of our extended family members still lived in the inner city. Quite often we hosted cousins "in the country" as they called it on weekends and school holidays. Knowing how we lived compared to some of cousins showed me the value of working smarter, all my aunts and uncles worked hard and many have college degrees, but parents took a few more "risks". The ability to see money as a tool for creating the lifestyle I choose to live is one of rhe greatest legacies my parents have bestowed on me. Hence it's not. a specific amount of money that my happiness is tied to, it's the lifestyle my wife & I create
Posted @ Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:21 PM by Derrick
@Derrick - thanks for the thoughtful comment. Much wisdom in what you say and I think to some degree I may have learned the same thing from my parents.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:36 PM by arjun
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics